Would You Buy the PS3 if it Didn’t Have Games?
Sunday, August 20th, 2006
“The first five million people are going to buy it, whatever it is, even if it didn’t have games.” These interesting words were spoken by Sony Euro CEO David Reeves during a recent interview. The question, though, seems fit to ask: Would you still buy the PS3 even if it didn’t have games to go with it? I find it a hard question to answer.
Looming in the shadows, the PS3 could lure in some of those 5 million initial buyers with its (somewhat) cheap price considering it has the new Blu-Ray technology. Considering what Blu-Ray could do for the next generation of video games could be another way to grab systems off the shelf. Without games, though, what else is left to imagine for the PS3? If Sony is looking to manufacture for the “social” gamer, then they may lose more than they will gain. If they take the “hardcore” gamers out of the equation, then they are ignoring over 50% of gamers. Gamers don’t buy games because it’s “the cool thing to do,” or because it will increase the appraised value of your home. Gamers buy games because they love video games and the sensation they get when they play video games, whether it is to relieve stress from everyday work, playing together with friends, or just playing in your free time. This, oddly enough, seems to be a fact that some companies seem to be forgetting.



After losing a 90 million dollar suit against Immersion Corporation over the illegal use of their force-feedback and “haptic” technologies, Sony has taken a step in the wrong direction and has removed the vibration feature in their controllers for their upcoming PS3 console. Citing the illegal use of their vibration technology, Immersion President Victor Viegas also had the jury slap an injunction on Sony that would stop them from producing, manufacturing, or even selling anything relating to Immersion’s technology.